Chronologia forum — resistance to Third Story–style outreach

What this is. An investigation grounded in forum.chronologia.org (the official discussion board of the Новая Хронология / New Chronology project). It documents attitudes and pushback visible there, not the views of “Russians” or “the East” as a whole.

Weak extrapolation (explicitly hypothetical). You may guess that some patterns could appear among other Russian-speaking, NC-curious readers offline or on other platforms. That guess is not evidenced here; the evidence base is this forum only.

Inputs. Forum captures (threads, search hits) plus your field observations (labeled) where they parallel or explain forum behavior. Television, foreign ministry rhetoric, or national public opinion are out of scope for this file.

Scope caveat. Small sample: one flagship thread, index-level themes, one adjacent thread, and keyword search snapshots (April 2026).

1. West vs East — engagement pattern (your observation, not forum data)

You contrast how people engage your material:

• West (your experience): debunking, passive-aggressive debate — engagement that still contests the text.
• East (your experience): explicit refusal to look, turning away, then social copying of that refusal so that nobody is looking.

This is a personal comparative hypothesis about outreach mechanics. §2–§4 show that on Chronologia you get both refusal-to-look (Иван) and substantive pushback (Lukianov) — i.e. the board is not uniform.

2. Case study: Chronologia forum — “The Third Story” thread

Source: forum.chronologia.org — The Third Story — прошу критики и вычитки (project: Новая Хронология / New Chronology; “Свободная площадка” = free-form subforum).

2.1 Original post (protricity)

Polite, structured ask: substantive critique of logic, dating, sources; help with Russian wording; sensitivity to forum rules and “not looking like advertising”; links to paradigmthreat.net/timeline and offer of draft via PM. Also notes recurring disappearance of English site section “How it was in reality” from chronologia.org.

2.2 Administrator lirik — deflection / joke / non-engagement

• Morozov quip: “А Морозов-то ненастоящий!” (“Morozov isn’t the real one!”) — play on authenticity / seriousness.
• Site did not open from their side.

Attitude signal: humor and dismissal rather than opening the book; frames the outreach as not quite serious or not quite accessible.

2.3 Lukianov — infrastructure + willingness to skim

Explains that some sites block Russian IPs for political reasons (mirror to Roskomnadzor-type blocking); with a foreign IP the site opened. This is a real friction layer independent of ideology: your material may be unreadable without VPN or mirror.

Later, Lukianov skimmed the Russian translation, objected to factual framing (Fomenko as “state-sponsored historian”), and drew a hard genre line:

• NC historical work is rejected by professional historians; no state grants for NC; Soviet-era party historians even wrote denunciations — so your “state-sponsored” wording read as false and insulting.
• Catastrophism / 4077 BCE / Saturn / giants / Martians — “не наука,” closer to fantasy or esoterica.
• Strategic suspicion: hypothesizes the book’s purpose might be to discredit NC by mixing NC with “Martian” material — Russian proverb “ложка дёгтя портит бочку мёда” (a spoonful of tar spoils a barrel of honey).

Attitude signal: one of the few participants who actually engaged text; engagement is gatekept by “science” and loyalty to NC’s reputation. The Martian/satellite layer triggers contamination fear, not curiosity.

2.4 Иван (Taganrog) — explicit refusal to look

Uses proverb “Кому и кобыла – невеста” (“To someone, even a mare is a bride” — i.e. tastes differ / not for me).

Core lines (paraphrase from Russian):

• Not even a compilation — a dump (свалка).
• Some people dig in dumps; thanks for the invitation to dig in yours, but “я пас” (I pass / fold).

Adds pop-culture tag line from The Chronicles of Riddick.

Attitude signal: polite contempt; socially cheap to dismiss wholesale without chapter-and-verse debate. Matches your “won’t look, then others follow” pattern at micro scale: one visible pass sets tone.

2.5 Author reply to Иван

You note disappointment not at criticism but at sameness with what you already hear in the West — hoped for something different from that community, got the same refusal register.

2.6 Quantitative footnote (as of fetch)

Attachments showed non-trivial download counts (e.g. docx files with on the order of 5–16 downloads in the captured state) while public replies stayed sparse — “silent sampling” may coexist with vocal refusal.

3. Broader forum scan (index-level, April 2026)

Fetched listing pages:

• Новая Хронология (viewforum.php?f=2): declared scientific scope — “only chronology and reconstruction of history.”
• Свободная площадка (viewforum.php?f=3): “free forum,” but culture still orbits NC canon, Russian medieval/early modern puzzles, forgeries, astronomy/chronology, Shroud, etc.
• Уголок дурева (f=41): labeled “Мусорка” (trash heap) — exists as pressure valve for material main boards reject.

Recurring topic clusters visible in titles/snippets:

• Medieval–early modern focus: e.g. Turin Shroud and NC, Copernicus / Almagest / Nabonassar era, monastic etymologies, Ivan III/IV doubling, Kulikovo field, Horde/English lexicon, fake chronicles, Würzburg/Trithemius forgeries.
• Linguistics as a separate disciplined grid (many alphabet subforums).
• Reputation defense: threads on Nosovsky, “weak points of NC,” astronomical critiques of NC Almagest dating.
• Politics-adjacent tension: thread title “Еще раз о Сундакове. Без современной политики.” — explicit attempt to quarantine modern politics while discussing a public figure tied to “cradle civilizations” narratives.

Implication for Third Story (on this forum): the board’s center of gravity is chronology and medieval–imperial reconstruction, not speculative cosmology or UFO/Martian frames — even when participants reject mainstream academic history.

4. Adjacent thread: “Fomenko = Russian chauvinist” stereotype and fear of “political project”

Source: Еще раз о Сундакове. Без современной политики.

Ybyrd13 reports acquaintances who equate Fomenko with “Russian chauvinism” and put him in the same bucket as Sundakov — without having read Fomenko. Pushback on metal-detecting / stratigraphy triggers hostility. Links a 2014 episode where a Ukrainian public figure reportedly weaponized a sensational book title (“Christ was born in Crimea…”) for propaganda, which colored how some audiences read any NC-adjacent popularization.

SailorMoon describes cognitive distortion: disappointment in a personality spilled onto NC; intrusive thought — “maybe it’s all one big political project.” Sought a direct answer from NC-side authorities; describes the reply as subtle (“намёк поняла”) and resolves to be more cautious — classic trust fragility.

Relevance (forum-local): NC-adjacent work by an outsider can be read through nationalist / propaganda templates; that can increase refusal-to-look because engagement carries identity risk for the reader. This is inference from this thread, not a survey of Russia.

5. “Open vs closed” layers — your thesis vs what the forum shows

You observe (general outreach, not forum-specific):

• Openness to the idea that Western institutions manipulate history (especially ~13th–18th c. and colonial narratives).
• Cold shoulder toward deep antiquity reframes, young-Earth–adjacent chronology, American-style deep state bundling, aliens, grand conspiracy aesthetics.

What Chronologia threads support:

• Welcomed or normalized on the board: forgery talk, radiocarbon vs NC, astronomical dating disputes, lexical parallels — “history-as-forensics.”
• Rejected or treated as poison when bundled with NC: catastrophism + “Martians” + Saturn-as-cosmology in your book → esoterica / discredit-by-association (Lukianov on t=2156).

Interpretation (forum-only): Legitimacy tokens on this board are chronology methods and primary-source games, not Saturnian cosmology or exogenesis. Whether the same split holds off this forum is not established here.

5a. Forum keyword survey (April 2026)

Searches run via the forum’s public search (search.php?keywords=…). Counts are post hits, not scholarly exhaustiveness. Rate limiting required spacing requests (~10+ s).

Saturn on Chronologia — two registers (finding)

The forum uses the word «Сатурн» in two unrelated ways. Treating them as one “Saturn discourse” would misread the board.

A. Third Story thread (t=2156) — catastrophic / alternate-cosmology register

• Lukianov groups Saturn with 4077 BCE, giants, and «марсиане»: not science («не наука»), nearer to fantasy or esoterica; mixing this material with New Chronology risks discrediting NC — ложка дёгтя портит бочку мёда.
• protricity replies that this layer is not offered as textbook physics; the genre judgment is acknowledged; any specific falsifiable objection would go into the open-questions / investigation workflow.

B. Bulk of forum corpus (search сатурн, ~32 hits) — classical planet / NC dating register

Typical posts use Saturn as a named classical planet inside horoscope-based chronology and art history: Nativity / Magi readings (Jupiter, Saturn, Mercury), Copernicus / Almagest / planetarium (Stellarium) checks, zodiac monuments (e.g. Pforzheim Dormition), Apocalypse horoscope threads, Mithraic reliefs (planet-glyph identification), typos and software verification tangents (e.g. Senenmut zodiac — “close eyes on Saturn in Taurus”). In that hit set, Saturnian cosmology (polar configuration, EU, “Saturn as sun”) does not appear as a sustained board-wide topic; it appears explicitly as a problem mainly where your book bundles it with Martians and deep-time catastrophism.

Implication for outreach: «Сатурн» is unremarkable on Chronologia until it signals Velikovsky-style / exogenesis / “Martian” framing next to NC — then it becomes reputation risk for readers who want NC kept forensic, not esoteric.

Takeaway: the Third Story stack (Saturnian cosmology, “the blip,” hollow-Earth curiosity, YEC-adjacent chronology, Martian tropes) lives large in paradigm-threat-timeline / paradigm-threat-files (e.g. Saturnian index, page.md anchor the blip, hollow-Earth documentary link, scalar/Saturnian life framing) but is sparse or absent as a sustained discourse on Chronologia — which matches Lukianov’s “this isn’t science / you’re spoiling NC” reaction.

6. Technical and trust barriers (stacked)

7. Challenges catalog — predictions for Chronologia-style audiences

1. Refusal without reading — high-status move (свалка, я пас).
2. Moral gatekeeping — “are you discrediting NC?”
3. Science theater — astronomy, stratigraphy, institutional credentials as legitimacy tokens.
4. Geopolitical decoding — everything read as Western op or propaganda unless carefully framed.
5. Bandwidth collapse — long synthetic timelines feel like dumping unless heavily segmented and source-anchored.
6. Access friction — mirrors, VPN notes, offline bundles for RU readers.
7. Trust asymmetry — you may need Russian-language endorsers inside NC culture more than you need another Western argument.

8. Possible rhetorical adjustments (hypotheses, not prescriptions)

• Firewall sections in the book and in pitches: “This block is NC-adjacent chronology; this block is speculative cosmology; do not merge in promotion.”
• Lead with forensic history aligned to 13th–18th c. manipulation narratives before deep time or exotic layers.
• Correct institutional facts about Fomenko/Nosovsky early and visibly — removes an easy bad-faith excuse.
• Acknowledge colonialism/European dynastic critique as compatible with your arc so readers do not file you under “American chaos internet.”
• Offer plaintext / PDF / mirror paths for jurisdictions with blocks.

9. Further research (not done here)

• Re-run / widen forum.chronologia.org search (and archive-search) for: НЛО, заговор, плазм*, Талбот, EU, Великовский (alt. spellings).
• Read the 8 “молодая земля” hits in context to see how many are creationist vs accidental collocation.
• Compare VK/Telegram NC cells — different venues, not covered here.
• Track chronologia.org English section removals with timestamps (your “How it was in reality” note).

10. Source index

11. Draft forum reply (Chronologia t=2156) — Russian + English

Use as-is or shorten before posting. Attachments: add when ready.

Russian (для форума)

Здравствуйте. Я не собирался писать ещё одно сообщение, но обстоятельства изменились. Мой основной хостинг — GitHub — без объяснения причин приостановил все 72 моих репозитория. По времени это совпало с выходом подкаста — поэтому картинка в первом посте сейчас не открывается. Я навсегда ухожу с облачных платформ.

Если сообществу не противно, я положу здесь актуальные версии книги и приложения как резервную копию: при дальнейших банах и «чёрных списках» реален риск потерять почти десять лет работы.

Параллельно готовлю второе издание — в первую очередь для верующих читателей: христиан и сионистов. Я называю сионистов прямо, потому что сейчас это, похоже, самая крупная для меня аудитория. Большую часть жизни я относился к сионизму критически, но недавние события, на мой взгляд, меняют правила игры; возможно, скорее окажется, что всё было совсем не так, как мы думали. Сам я не религиозен.

В «Third Story» я увидел способ свести воедино линии разных религий: достаточно не тащить за собой то, от чего люди разворачиваются и перестают смотреть — например Сатурн и «марсиан». Для такого издания потери ничтожны по сравнению с тем, что можно выиграть. Главное послание для меня такое: люди когда‑то были частью единой мировой религии, где нельзя было представить, что будут убивать друг друга или спорить о природе веры. Если через идеи Новой хронологии показать, что они все прошли через одну и ту же войну, один и тот же огонь, в одно время — это важнее всего остального; всё прочее — почти детали и развлечение.

Спасибо за терпение.

English (same message)

Hello. I wasn’t planning to post again, but circumstances changed. My main host, GitHub, suspended all 72 of my repositories without giving a reason. It was timed with a podcast release — that’s why the image in the first post is down. I’m moving off cloud for good.

If the forum doesn’t mind, I’ll drop the latest book and appendix here as safekeeping: with more bans or blacklisting, I could lose nearly ten years of research.

I’m also preparing a second edition aimed chiefly at religious readers — Christians and Zionists. I say Zionists because, right now, they look like my biggest demographic. I’ve been anti-Zionist most of my life, but recent events have, in my view, changed the nature of the game we thought we knew — and everything may turn out very different from what we believed, very soon. I’m not religious, either.

With the Third Story I found a way to bridge gaps across religions: I only need to leave out certain things — like Saturn and Martians — that make people turn away and refuse to look. What would be lost in that edition is negligible compared to what would be gained. The main message is that there was once a unified world religion where no one could fathom killing each other or arguing about the nature of their faith. If I can show, through New Chronology, that they all went down in the same war, the same fire, at the same time — that would be the biggest message of all; everything else is almost entertainment-level detail.

Thanks for your patience.

Investigation compiled for paradigm-threat-files. Evidence: forum.chronologia.org, March–April 2026. §1 and §5 (your thesis paragraph) are author-reported and are not claims about Russia as a whole. Update as new forum evidence arrives.

Keywords: #Russian #Perspective #Chronologia #Forum #Resistance #Third #Story #Style #Outreach