Share
Share
CIA-RDP96-00788R001900760001-9)
Companion to Mars Exploration 1984 — RV investigation — author verdict (Mars anchor): Conclusion (author verdict, Mars anchor). Earth-side two-way / Iran / Super Cockpit rhymes: RV two-way, Iran revival investigation. This file is a section-by-section digest of the declassified PDF text (protocol + transcript): layout, order, coordinates, and quoted language. Interpretive meaning (present Martian civilization in 1984, ~1 Ma card line as misdirection, RV as real-time imagery + memory channel) lives in the Mars investigation — not repeated here line-by-line. Full plain text (same directory, pdftotext + header): [cia-reading-room-mars-exploration-1984-transcript.txt](cia-reading-room-mars-exploration-1984-transcript.txt).
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Title (PDF) | MARS EXPLORATION |
| Date (session) | May 22, 1984 |
| CIA Reading Room ID | CIA-RDP96-00788R001900760001-9 |
| A-tier PDF | cia.gov/readingroom/docs/CIA-RDP96-00788R001900760001-9.pdf |
| Landing | document page |
| Form | Cover / acquisition instructions + MON/SUB TRANSCRIPT |
| Release line (banner) | “Approved For Release 2000/08/08 : CIA-RDP96-00788R001900760001-9” (appears on pages) — date stamp only; not a FOIA case narrative (Mars investigation §5.7) |
| Plain text (in-repo) | [cia-reading-room-mars-exploration-1984-transcript.txt](cia-reading-room-mars-exploration-1984-transcript.txt) — **pdftotext** extract; verify against A-tier PDF |
Roles: MON = monitor / interviewer; SUB = subject / remote viewer.
**pdftotext quirk:** pause clusters in the PDF text layer often extract as Unicode bullet (•, U+2022), not ASCII . — the in-repo [.txt](cia-reading-room-mars-exploration-1984-transcript.txt) normalizes those to periods (see its header Encoding note).Summary: Repeated “Approved For Release 2000/08/08” strip with RDP96 control number; title MARS EXPLORATION and date May 22, 1984. Some circulating files insert non-CIA front pages — see §2.
Summary: The file states that the site was acquired by “Sealed envelope coupled with geographic coordinates.” The envelope was handed to the subject immediately before the interview and not opened until after the interview. Inside was a 3 × 5 card with:
Section purpose: Establishes blind / double-blind style framing (envelope unopened until end) and ties the session to Mars + deep time + coordinates as tasking, not as an astronomical observation log.
Tasking-card epoch (Mars investigation verdict): The quoted “approximately 1 million years B.C.” string appears on the released acquisition summary. The Mars investigation treats that clause as deliberate deep-time misdirection (readers steered away from present Martian civilization in 1984), not as an honest geochronology label — while still logging the administrative fork that re-typing or substitution could have altered the visible line without clearing-document disclosure (Mars investigation §6 item 2, §5.4). This writeup quotes the PDF as-is in §4–§6.
Opening timestamp (MON, monitor-heard): ROJ for 5/22 (May 22nd), time 10:09 AM (marked * in original — monitor comment).
MON instructs SUB to use only the envelope information and focus on 40.89 degrees north, 9.55 degrees west.
SUB: Oblique view of a pyramid or pyramid form, very high, in a large depressed area; color yellowish, okra-colored.
Summary: Opens on monumental architecture + arid palette at the first coordinate pair.
MON: Move in time to the time on the card; describe what is happening.
SUB: Severe clouds, more like a dust storm; geologic problem; perception “really weird.” MON asks for raw perceptions.
SUB: Emphasizes geologic problem.
MON: Go back to before the geologic problem.
SUB: Total difference — “mountains of dirt” that appear and disappear when going “before”; large flat surfaces, smooth, angles, walls — megalithic, very large.
Summary: Sharp environmental discontinuity: storm/catastrophe vs pre-event mega-engineered surfaces.
MON: Before the geologic activity, look for any activity.
SUB: Shadow of people, very tall, thin — “as if they were there and they're not there anymore.”
MON: Go back to when they are there.
SUB: Static / fragmentary impressions; hard to hold.
MON: Report raw data only.
SUB: Very large people, thin and tall, strange clothes.
Summary: Humanoid presences scale as anomalous size; perception shifts absence ↔ presence.
MON moves SUB “in this time period” to 46.45 north, 353.22 east.
SUB: Deep canyon (not “cavern”); steep walls; structure as if the wall of the canyon itself has been carved; again very large structures, smooth stone, huge rooms, rabbit warren-like corners; very high ceiling, very wide walls. MON confirms that insides/outsides exist.
Summary: Interiorized geology read as habitable carved volumes.
SUB: End of a very large road; a very large marker; Washington Monument overlay — obelisk language.
Summary: Axis / monument imagery at a road terminus.
SUB: Huge circular basin surrounded almost all the way by ragged, very tall mountains; scale seems off — everything very big.
Summary: Planetary-scale landform (as perceived); MON accepts difficulty and asks SUB to continue.
SUB: Cluster of squares (almost flush with ground), connected; something very white or reflects light.
MON asks viewing angle; SUB: Oblique left angle; sun “weird.”
Summary: Grid-like ground installations with high albedo.
SUB: Radiating pattern; strange intersecting roads dug into valleys (road slightly below rim); neat channels, very deep.
MON notes SUB is “electrically nulled out” and asks for focus.
SUB: Signal tough, sporadic.
Summary: Engineered linear earthworks or transport cuts; monitor frames signal loss as part of session management.
MON: Large movement exercise; hold time focus, move to 15 north, 198 east.
SUB: Intersecting features like aqueducts; rounded bottom carved channels, road beds; pointed tops on horizon; horizon misty, vague, far away.
Summary: Hydraulic / transport infrastructure motif continues; visibility degrades.
MON: Move to 80 south, 64 east.
SUB: Pyramids — “can't tell if it's overlay or not 'cause they're different.” Then: “got both,” huge; “interesting perception.”
MON (monitor comment *, not for SUB): judges that SUB is losing accurate movement but is drawn to interesting targets; decides to let SUB explore what attracts him rather than strict coordinate targeting.
SUB: Structures filtered from storms / “shelters from storms.”
Summary: Explicit protocol relaxation — session pivots from precision geo tasking to follow salience; imagery converges on storm-buffered megaforms (pyramids again).
MON: Go inside one structure; find activity (timestamp: ~37 minutes real time, *).
SUB: Chambers, stripped of furnishings — functional, sleeping / poor word choice → hibernation-class waiting; raw inputs of storms, savage storm, sleeping through storms. MON asks about inhabitants.
SUB: Very tall, large but thin people; clothing like light silk, cut to fit (not flowing).
MON: Move close; ask them to describe themselves.
SUB: Ancient; dying — “past their time or age”; philosophic; seeking a way to survive, can’t.
MON (timestamp ~40 minutes, “voltage reversal”, *).
SUB: Can’t find their way out; hanging on while looking for something to return or “something coming with the answer.”
MON: What are they waiting for?
SUB: A group went to find a new place to live; “overwhelming input” of corruption of their environment; failing very rapidly; group went a long way.
MON: What caused the atmospheric or environment disturbance?
SUB: Difficult; then raw: impression of a globe going through a comet’s tail / “river of something” — “space pictures,” cosmic scale.
Summary: Narrative arc inside structures: last people, environmental failure, waiting, off-world / evacuation party; MON pushes for cause of disturbance → SUB offers astrophysical metaphor.
MON: Ask whether SUB can be known to them and whether SUB can help.
SUB (verbatim cluster, pdftotext / in-repo .txt):
All I get is that they must just wait. Doesn't know who I am. Think he perceives I'm a hallucination or something.
Summary: No consensual contact framed as successful two-way dialogue; epistemic break between parties — yet SUB explicitly models target-side discounting of the viewer (hallucination), i.e. language on the mutual-contact surface. Mars investigation: §5.3 two-way epistemics + sibling Iran / two-way file.
MON: When the others left, how did they go?
SUB: Impression of inside a larger boat; rounded walls; shiny metal.
MON: Follow their journey; where they go.
SUB: Really crazy place — volcanos, gas pockets, strange plants; volatile; “from the frying pan into the fire”; more vegetation than the prior place; different kind of storm.
Summary: Transport metaphor (boat, metal) chained to high-energy biome (volcano / gas / exotic flora).
MON brings SUB back to present time, 22 May 1984, sound of MON’s voice, then room.
END OF INTERVIEW
NOTE (printed in file): ()* Indicates monitor comment recorded but not heard by the subject.
Approximate order as MON issues moves (all in the time on the card unless noted). SUB does not read these from the sealed card during the interview; MON supplies them verbally.
| Order | Latitude | Longitude | § above |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 40.89° N | 9.55° W | 5.1 |
| 2 | 46.45° N | 353.22° E | 5.4 |
| 3 | 45.86° N | 354.1° E | 5.5 |
| 4 | 35.26° N | 213.24° E | 5.6 |
| 5 | 34.6° N | 213.09° E | 5.7 |
| 6 | 34.57° N | 212.22° E | 5.8 |
| 7 | 15° N | 198° E | 5.9 |
| 8 | 80° S | 64° E | 5.10 |
Digest: The session is coordinate-hopping while MON holds the viewer on the card’s printed epoch string in-protocol; under the Mars investigation Conclusion, that string is misdirection, and the phenomenology is present-tense civilization + memory-field contact — not “tourism to an extinct million-year biosphere.” A late-phase shift from strict targeting to follow SUB’s salience still appears in the dialogue (§5.10).
Is: A primary CIA Reading Room session record — useful for exact language, protocol, tasking structure, and public-declassification provenance.
Is not (narrow digest role): A NASA instrument paper; a court exhibit bundle; or a substitute for the Mars investigation file’s epistemic / political argument stack (Conclusion, Limits, §5.6 dismissal literature). AIR program-evaluation PDFs address whether RV was kept as intel — orthogonal to how that file weights the Mars session as evidence (Conclusion).
~/dev/wget/cia/cia-reading-room-local-mirror-and-ocr-operations.mdKeywords: #MarsExploration1984 #MARSExploration #RemoteViewing #Stargate #ReadingRoom #CIAReadingRoom #MONSUB #SealedEnvelope #MarsCoordinates #DeclassifiedPDF #FOIA #May221984 #RDP96MarsSession