Zur Frage der psychologischen Grundlagen und des Ursprungs der Religion — Index
TL;DR: Lecture delivered 25 March 1921 at the Psychological Society of Sofia (translated from Bulgarian). Kinkel applies Freudian psychoanalysis to the origin and development of religion, arguing for a psychoanalytic sociology in which religious ideas and moods derive from universal infantile complexes.
Author: Dr. Johann Kinkel (Ivan Kinkel)
Published: 1922 (Internationaler Psychoanalytischer Verlag, Leipzig–Wien–Zürich)
Subtitle: Beitrag zum System der psychoanalytischen Soziologie
Source: Expanded reprint from Imago, Zeitschrift für Anwendung der Psychoanalyse auf die Geisteswissenschaften, Vol. VIII (1922)
Full text: Ivan-Kinkel-Psychologische-Grundlagen-1922.zip → extracted to Ivan-Kinkel-Psychologische-Grundlagen-1922/ (80 OCR pages, German)
Overview
Lecture delivered 25 March 1921 at the Psychological Society of Sofia (translated from Bulgarian). Kinkel applies Freudian psychoanalysis to the origin and development of religion, arguing for a psychoanalytic sociology in which religious ideas and moods derive from universal infantile complexes.
Main Arguments
1. Biogenetic Law Applied to Psychology
- Ontogeny recapitulates phylogeny (Haeckel): Individual development repeats species development.
- Sociological parallel: The “primitive” mentality of Naturvölker (indigenous/natural peoples) corresponds to the psychology of the modern child.
- Child psychology and primitive religious symbolism share the same structural patterns.
2. Father and Mother Complexes as Foundation of Religion
- Mother complex: Good fairy, mother earth, nurturing figures = symbol of the mother.
- Father complex: Giant, terrifying or powerful figures, sky gods = symbol of the father.
- Infantile sexuality: First object of (unconscious) sexual sympathy for girls = father; Oedipal structure in both sexes.
- Religion sublimates these complexes; ritual and doctrine express repressed infantile wishes.
3. Monotheism as Father-Projection
- God the Father = projection of the paternal ideal; authority, law, moral demand.
- Jehovah (Jewish), Christian God = same structure: paternal authority internalised as conscience (Kant’s categorical imperative).
- Cultural parallels: feudal lord, pater familias in medieval Europe; South Slav and Turkish patriarchalism.
4. Symbolism
- Fairy tales: Fairy = mother, giant = father; child’s fantasies encoded.
- Language: Primitive word-formation (e.g. Bik/Byk for ox from the sound “bu”) as symbolic.
- Number symbols in children: 1 = pillar, 6 = woman with child, etc.
- Same symbolism appears in primitive religion.
5. Regression: Russian Khlysty Sect
- Khlysty (Chlysty): Secret prayer meetings → religious ecstasy → dancing, jumping → candles “extinguish” → sexual orgies (hetero- and homosexual) in darkness.
- Kinkel interprets this as regression to ancient sexual-religious forms (spring festivals, fertility rites, Mother Earth / Father Heaven; Astarte-Aphrodite mysteries on Cyprus).
- Sublimated libido returns to raw sexual form under ecstatic conditions.
6. Infantilism as Core of Religion
- “Feeling of absolute dependence” on nature (birth, death, rain, thunder) = religious root.
- Primitive and modern alike: helplessness before nature → flight into infantile submission to a parental figure (God).
- Harnack (1892): Religion = dissolving oneself in a higher personality; soul finds God as Father “like the child in the father’s house.”
- Matthew 18:1–5 (Christ: “Become as little children”) cited as scriptural support for religious infantilism.
7. Persistence and Regression
- Religion infantilism persists in moderns; trauma can trigger regression.
- Post-WWI Germany: “Search for a new religion” in some socialist circles = regression under disappointment.
- Conclusion: “We are powerless against the great laws of psychology that lie hidden in the depths of our soul.”
Structure (Approximate)
| Pages | Content |
| 1–4 | Title, dedication (Krstnikoff, Psychological Society of Sofia) |
| 5–12 | Introduction; biogenetic law; child ≈ primitive |
| 13–20 | Father/mother complexes; symbolism; monotheism |
| 21–55 | Development of religious ideas; ethnological examples |
| 56–60 | Khlysty sect; regression to sexual-religious orgies |
| 61–76 | Infantilism; Harnack; Matthew; conclusion |
| 77–80 | Coda; “Quo vadis, sapientia?”; printer colophon |
Key References
- Ernst Haeckel — Biogenetic law
- Freud — Psychoanalysis, Oedipus, sublimation
- Adolf Harnack — Dogmengeschichte III, p. 529 (religion as childlike relation to Father)
- Dostoevsky — Brothers Karamazov, Iljuschetschka (Ilusha); Dr. Krstnikoff’s observation on sadism, pity, wounded childish feelings after father’s public humiliation
- Biblical — Matthew 18:1–5
- Ethnology — Astarte-Aphrodite mysteries, Cyprus; universal Father-Heaven / Mother-Earth cults
Dedication
To Dr. Nicolaus Krstnikoff (founder of the Psychological Society of Sofia) and its first members: N. Popoff, Sp. Kasandjieff, Mladen Nikoloff, Michael Dimitroff, Dimitër Botscharoff, Nicolo Dolaptchieff.
Cross-References
- Nenovsky 2015 — Kinkel’s economic theory; biography; Schmoller, psychoanalysis in Bulgaria
- Sources index — All Ivan Kinkel materials
- Gottfried Kinkel — Possible family link (unresolved)
Keywords: #Psychologische #Grundlagen #1922 #Zur #Frage #Der #Psychologischen #Und #Des #Ursprungs #Religion
Share
