Editor: Alfred de Grazia
Contributors: Ralph Juergens, Livio Stecchini, and others
Year: 1966
Series: Pre-Quantavolution (precursor volume)
| File | Type | Words | Size |
|---|---|---|---|
../the_velikovsky_affair.txt | Plain text | ~77,876 | 471 KB |
../the_velikovsky_affair.pdf | — | 656 KB |
Source: https://grazian-archive.com/quantavolution/QuantaHTML/plaintext/velikovsky_affair.txt
The Velikovsky Affair is the foundational document of the organized response to the academic suppression of Immanuel Velikovsky's Worlds in Collision (1950). Edited by de Grazia, the collection examines the social, political, and epistemological mechanisms by which the scientific establishment sought to destroy Velikovsky's reputation and suppress his work before it received fair evaluation.
The title — Scientism vs. Science — summarizes de Grazia's distinction: scientism is the ideological defense of existing paradigms by institutional means (ridicule, blacklist, refusal to publish); science is the open evaluation of evidence. The book documents how scientism won in the short term, setting the template for all subsequent suppression of catastrophist research.
Contributors include Ralph Juergens (electromagnetic basis for Velikovsky's claims) and Livio Stecchini (metrological and historical corroboration). This is the earliest systematic catastrophist counter-attack against academic suppression.
"Best overviews to the controversy" — cited as essential background reading for understanding the Velikovsky suppression
(referenced in Cook's annotated bibliography at saturniancosmology.org/books.php.html)
Worlds in Collision was published by Macmillan in 1950 under enormous public interest. The backlash from astronomers — who organized a boycott threatening Macmillan's textbook business — forced transfer to Doubleday before the book was independently evaluated. This is the event The Velikovsky Affair documents and analyzes.